Skip to main content
Glama

create-team-holiday

Schedule a team holiday by defining name, start and end dates, type (full/partial day), department, region, recurrence, and calendar display options.

Instructions

Create a new team holiday

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesHoliday name
descriptionNoHoliday description
start_dateYesHoliday start date (YYYY-MM-DD)
end_dateYesHoliday end date (YYYY-MM-DD)
holiday_typeNoHoliday type (0=full day, 1=partial day)
department_idNoDepartment ID for department-specific holiday
region_idNoRegion ID for region-specific holiday
recurringNoRecurring status (0=one-time, 1=recurring)
recurrence_patternNoRecurrence pattern for recurring holidays
activeNoActive status (0=inactive, 1=active)
notesNoAdditional notes
colorNoHex color code for calendar display
all_dayNoAll day status (0=not all day, 1=all day)
timezoneNoTimezone for the holiday
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states 'create' without mentioning permissions, side effects, or any constraints beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (5 words), with no wasted words. It is front-loaded and efficient, though it could benefit from slightly more detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 14 parameters, no output schema, and many sibling tools, the description is insufficient. It does not explain return values, prerequisites, or how it fits into the broader tool suite.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the parameters are already documented well. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, meriting a baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('create') and the resource ('team holiday'). However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'create-public-holiday' or 'create-timeoff', missing a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'create-public-holiday' or 'create-timeoff'. The description lacks any usage context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/asachs01/float-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server