update_tools_valves_by_id_api_v1_tools_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states an action without disclosing effects, permissions, rate limits, or what 'valves' are. The output schema exists but is not leveraged to explain behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief (4 words), but it is under-specified rather than concise. It lacks essential detail and does not justify its brevity with completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of an update operation with a nested object parameter, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. It fails to explain what valves are or how the update differs from other tool update operations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, but the description adds no information about parameters. It does not explain what 'id' or 'form_data' represent, nor what valid values for form_data might be.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb+resource pattern ('Update Tools Valves By Id'), but 'valves' is ambiguous without context. It does not distinguish from sibling tools like update_tools_by_id_api_v1_tools_id, which also updates a tool by ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as update_tools_by_id or get_tools_valves_by_id. No usage context or exclusions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.