get_user_permissisions_api_v1_users_permissions_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, side effects, or return format. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and fails to inform the agent about the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise, but it contains a typo ('Permissisions') and lacks critical information. It does not earn its place as it fails to provide sufficient context.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not clarify which user's permissions are retrieved, the response structure, or any preconditions. The presence of many similar sibling tools makes this lack of detail more severe.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has no parameters, so schema coverage is effectively 100%. The description adds no additional meaning beyond stating the tool gets user permissions, but since there are no parameters, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get User Permissisions' and the tool name indicate it retrieves user permissions, but it does not specify which user (e.g., current session user or a specific user). There is a sibling tool 'get_default_user_permissions' which retrieves default permissions for new users, but this tool lacks any distinguishing information. The typo 'Permissisions' reduces clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidelines are provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_default_user_permissions' or other user-related tools. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or scenarios where this tool is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.