get_file_by_id_api_v1_files

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as what the tool returns (output schema exists but not mentioned), authentication needs, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (four words) but fails to provide necessary context. Conciseness is not achieved because the brevity comes at the cost of useful information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With many sibling tools for file operations and an output schema available, the description is severely incomplete. It does not clarify the return value or how this tool differs from get_file_content_by_id or get_file_data_content_by_id.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although there is only one required parameter 'id', the description does not explain what type of ID (e.g., file ID, database ID) or provide example formats. Schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get File By Id' merely restates the tool name without adding any specific verb or resource distinction. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_file_content_by_id which also involve getting a file by ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as get_file_content_by_id or list_files. The description lacks context on use cases or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.