delete_function_by_id_api_v1_functions_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only says 'Delete Function By Id' without revealing any behavioral traits beyond the obvious mutation. There is no mention of idempotency, cascading effects, permissions needed, or what the function's status should be prior to deletion. With no annotations provided, the description fails to compensate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at three words, which is efficient but results in under-specification. It is not padded, but the brevity sacrifices necessary details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the sibling tools and the presence of an output schema, the description should include more context about the deletion scope, return value, or potential side effects. It is insufficient for an agent to fully understand the tool's behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has zero parameter descriptions (0% coverage), and the description does not add any meaning to the 'id' parameter. It does not explain the format, source, or constraints of the identifier, leaving the agent without essential context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'Delete', the resource 'Function', and the identifier method 'By Id'. It is specific enough to distinguish from other types of operations, but among many similarly named delete tools for different resources, it does not provide unique differentiation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus other tools (e.g., toggle, update, or other delete operations). There are no prerequisites, conditions, or alternative scenarios mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.