delete_skill_by_id_api_v1_skills_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and the description only repeats the name. It does not disclose any behavioral traits such as permanence, side effects, or required permissions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but lacks necessary detail. It is under-specified rather than concise, failing to provide minimal viable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete operation with no annotations and an output schema not described, the description should mention irreversibility, cascading effects, or return value. It does not.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the 'id' parameter (e.g., format, source, example). The description fails to compensate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete Skill By Id' clearly states the verb (Delete) and resource (Skill) and identifies the parameter (Id). It distinguishes from siblings like get_skill_by_id (read) and update_skill_by_id (modify).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No prerequisites, effects, or context provided. The description is minimal and does not help the agent decide.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.