get_prompt_by_command_api_v1_prompts_command

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states 'Get Prompt By Command', implying a read operation but without explicit confirmation or details on side effects, output behavior, or authentication requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is overly concise (3 words) but lacks necessary detail. It does not earn its brevity at the expense of clarity; the agent cannot infer proper usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema (not shown) and many sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what the tool returns, how the command parameter works, or how it fits among similar prompt-related tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the 'command' parameter. It fails to define what 'command' refers to or how it should be used, leaving the agent with no guidance.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get Prompt By Command' is essentially a tautology of the tool name. It does not specify what 'get prompt' entails (e.g., retrieve a single prompt or list) and does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_prompt_by_id or get_prompt_list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description gives no indication of when to use this tool over alternatives, nor does it mention prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.