delete_tools_by_id_api_v1_tools_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It indicates a destructive operation ('Delete'), but does not explain whether the deletion is irreversible, if it affects associated data, or if special permissions are required.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (3 words), which is efficient but may be too sparse. It is front-loaded with the core action, but lacks any structure or additional context that could be valuable without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (one parameter, output schema exists), the description is inadequate. It does not explain return values, success/failure behavior, or error conditions. The complete absence of parameter description further reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description adds no meaning to the 'id' parameter. It merely repeats the parameter name without explaining what the ID represents (e.g., 'the ID of the tool to delete').

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Delete Tools By Id' clearly states the verb (Delete), resource (Tools), and method (By Id). This directly conveys what the tool does and distinguishes it from other delete operations on different resources, such as delete_user_by_id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not specify that this is for permanently removing a tool, nor does it mention any prerequisites, such as the need for proper authorization or that the tool must exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.