get_folder_by_id_api_v1_folders

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It only states the basic operation, omitting details like return format, error handling, or authorization requirements. For a single-folder fetch, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (three words) but lacks necessary detail. It is not verbose, but the brevity reduces usefulness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema (not shown), the description still fails to explain the tool's purpose fully. It does not clarify what is returned or how it differs from list or update operations. Incomplete for a simple read tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% for the only parameter 'id'. The description does not add any meaning beyond the parameter name, such as format (UUID, integer) or source (e.g., from get_folders).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get Folder By Id' clearly indicates the verb (get) and resource (folder by id). It is specific but does not differentiate from sibling tools like get_folders_api_v1_folders, which lists all folders.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_folders_api_v1_folders, update_folder_name_by_id_api_v1_folders). The description provides no context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.