export_tools_api_v1_tools_export_get

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It merely says 'Export Tools' without describing the output format, whether it triggers a download, or any side effects. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (two words) but lacks structure and substance. While brevity is good, the trade-off is that it conveys very little useful information. A one-line sentence explaining the scope would improve it.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the large set of sibling export tools, this description is completely insufficient for an agent to decide when to use it. It does not specify what 'tools' refers to, and without output schema details (though it exists), the agent cannot understand the tool's return value or effect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and schema description coverage is 100% (empty). While a baseline of 4 might be considered for parameterless tools, the description adds no context about what is exported (e.g., all custom tools, built-in tools). Therefore, it is adequate but not informative, earning a 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Export Tools' is vague and fails to specify what exactly is being exported. Among many sibling export tools (e.g., export_skills, export_models), this provides no differentiation, making it unclear whether it exports custom tool definitions, tool configurations, or something else.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool versus alternatives like export_skills, export_models, or other export functions within the same sibling set.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.