get_channel_message_api_v1_channels

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It fails to state any behavioral traits such as read-only nature, authentication requirements, rate limits, or side effects. The minimal description implies a simple read operation but provides no explicit confirmation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but is under-specified rather than concise. It conveys no meaningful detail beyond the tool's name, making it akin to a tautology.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of the sibling tool list and the presence of an output schema, the description fails to provide necessary context about when to use this tool. It does not differentiate from similar tools, which is critical for correct selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description does not explain the two required parameters 'id' and 'message_id'. No information is added beyond the schema, leaving the agent without context on what these parameters represent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get Channel Message' merely restates the tool name, which already includes 'get_channel_message'. It lacks specificity about what is being retrieved and does not differentiate from siblings like get_channel_messages or get_channel_message_data.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_channel_messages or get_channel_message_data. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or conditions for use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.