get_user_groups_by_id_api_v1_users

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits such as read-only nature, authentication requirements, pagination, or response format. The agent has no insight into side effects or restrictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

At three words, the description is extremely brief but lacks necessary detail. While there is no fluff, the brevity compromises clarity and usefulness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and minimal description, the tool lacks essential context. The agent cannot determine what data is returned, how to interpret 'user groups', or any additional behavior needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema lists 'user_id' as a required string with no description (0% coverage). The description does not clarify the parameter's meaning, expected format, or constraints, leaving the agent with only the name.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get User Groups By Id' indicates retrieving user groups for a given user ID, but it is vague and does not specify the relationship (e.g., groups the user belongs to) or differentiate from similar sibling tools like 'get_user_groups_api_v1_users_groups_get'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The sibling list includes many tools but no explicit context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.