get_admin_details_api_v1_auths_admin_details_get
Fetches current admin account details from OpenWebUI to verify identity and manage configuration.
Instructions
Get Admin Details
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Fetches current admin account details from OpenWebUI to verify identity and manage configuration.
Get Admin Details
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description gives no behavioral information. It does not state whether the tool is read-only, requires authentication, or what side effects (if any) occur. The single phrase is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (3 words) but at the expense of clarity. It omits necessary context, making it under-specified rather than efficiently informative.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of parameters and output schema, the description should explain what admin details are returned. It does not. The presence of similar sibling tools (e.g., 'get_admin_config') makes this incompleteness more critical.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are no parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. Baseline for zero parameters is 4, but the description fails to clarify what 'Admin Details' encompasses, reducing the score. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get Admin Details' is vague and does not specify what kind of admin details are retrieved (e.g., user info, config, permissions). It fails to distinguish from sibling tool 'get_admin_config' which suggests a different scope.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not indicate when to use this tool over alternatives like 'get_admin_config' or 'get_session_user', nor does it mention any prerequisites or contexts.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TETRA-2023/open-webui-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server