share_chat_by_id_api_v1_chats

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, and the description does not disclose behavioral traits like side effects (e.g., making the chat public), required permissions, or reversibility. 'Share' implies mutation, but details are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is appropriately short for a simple tool. However, it is under-specified, and the brevity sacrifices helpfulness. It earns a baseline 3 for minimal structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not explain the return value or what success looks like. It also omits important context like authentication needs, error conditions, or the effect of the operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter 'id' with only a title, and schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, failing to explain the role or format of the ID.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Share Chat By Id' clearly indicates the tool shares a chat by its ID, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_shared_chat_by_id' (retrieve) and 'clone_shared_chat_by_id' (duplicate). However, it lacks specifics on what sharing entails (e.g., generating a link, setting permissions).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to share vs. clone vs. delete a shared chat. No prerequisites or context are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.