get_knowledge_files_by_id_api_v1_knowledge

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full behavioral burden. It states only 'Get Knowledge Files By Id' without disclosing pagination, ordering, filtering capabilities, or any side effects (all of which are present in the parameters).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (4 words) but sacrifices informativeness. It is front-loaded but lacks substance, making it minimally adequate for a simple tool but poor for one with multiple parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 6 parameters (including pagination and ordering) and no output schema details or annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It does not help the agent understand the tool's full capabilities or return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description adds no meaning to parameters like query, view_option, order_by, direction, or page. For a tool with 6 parameters, this is insufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Get Knowledge Files By Id' is a near-tautology of the tool name, providing no additional context about what constitutes a 'knowledge file' or how this differs from other knowledge-related tools like get_knowledge_by_id or search_knowledge_files.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus its many siblings (e.g., search_knowledge_files, get_knowledge_by_id). The agent must infer usage solely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.