create_folder_api_v1_folders
Creates a new folder with a given name, optionally under a parent folder, and with custom data or metadata.
Instructions
Create Folder
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | No | ||
| meta | No | ||
| name | Yes | ||
| parent_id | No |
Creates a new folder with a given name, optionally under a parent folder, and with custom data or metadata.
Create Folder
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | No | ||
| meta | No | ||
| name | Yes | ||
| parent_id | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description does not disclose behavioral traits beyond the action, such as whether it is destructive, permission requirements, or side effects. No annotations are present to supplement.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (two words), but this brevity comes at the cost of usefulness. It is not structured to front-load important information; it is merely a label.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has four parameters, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is completely inadequate. An agent cannot determine return values, required permissions, or parameter constraints.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description provides no explanation of the four parameters. Schema description coverage is 0%, so the agent has no guidance beyond parameter names and types.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Create Folder' clearly states the verb and resource, distinguishing it from sibling folder tools (e.g., update, delete, get). However, it lacks additional context such as scope or constraints.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to set parent_id or meta). No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TETRA-2023/open-webui-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server