fmod_workspace_createPlugin

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions return type but not how the tool decides which type of plugin to create, nor any side effects, permissions, or error conditions. The parameter 'identfier' is left unexplained, which is critical for a creation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence but includes redundant phrasing ('plug-in effect or a plug-in instrument' repeated) and an awkward space before the period. It could be more concise and structurally clean.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description should clarify the parameter's meaning and any constraints. It partially covers the return value but omits how the parameter influences creation, making it incomplete for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must add meaning to the parameter. It fails to explain the 'identfier' parameter—its purpose, expected format, or role in determining the plugin type. The schema itself has an empty description for the parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates either a plug-in effect or a plug-in instrument and returns a ManagedObject. However, it does not distinguish this from sibling tools like fmod_MixerBusEffectChain_addEffect, which also create effects but in a different context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when to create an effect vs. instrument, or how this tool fits into the workflow among sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.