fmod_Automator_addAutomationCurve

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, so description carries full burden. Only mentions creation and return type but fails to disclose side effects, permissions, or constraints like whether automation curves can be overwritten or if the parameter must exist already.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence plus a method reference, no fluff. However, the method reference in brackets may be confusing or unnecessary for an AI agent. Efficient but slightly unstructured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description is minimal. It does not explain what an AutomationCurve is, how it interacts with parameters, or what the returned ManagedObject represents. Lacks completeness for a tool in a complex domain like FMOD automation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for both parameters. The description adds 'on the parameter specified' which is redundant. Does not provide additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Creates a model.AutomationCurve on the parameter specified' with a verb and resource. Includes return type and method reference, but does not differentiate from sibling tools like fmod_AutomationCurve_addAutomationPoint or fmod_AutomatableObject_addAutomator.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. No prerequisites, context, or exclusions provided. The description only states what it does, not when it's appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.