fmod_project_findAvailablePlugins

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states the return type (array of strings) but does not mention whether the operation is read-only, whether it triggers any side effects, or if any permissions are needed. For a simple query tool, the lack of explicit safety info is acceptable but not ideal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description contains redundant repetition: 'Returns an array of strings that lists all available plugins.' is stated twice. This wastes space and could be more concise. The bracketed '[method · project.findAvailablePlugins]' is unnecessary. Conciseness suffers from redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there is no output schema, the description correctly indicates the return value is an array of strings listing plugins. It does not elaborate on the format or possible contents, but for a simple enumeration tool, this is sufficient. No missing critical information.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has no parameters, so the input schema is fully covered. The description adds no parameter-specific information, but none is needed. Baseline for 0 params is 4, and the description's brief mention of returning all plugins suffices.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool returns an array of strings listing all available plugins. The verb 'find' is appropriate and the resource 'plugins' is specific. Among siblings, no other tool has a similar purpose, so it is well-distinguished.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, context, or exclusions. Given the large list of sibling tools, usage guidelines would be helpful but are absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.