fmod_MasterAssetFolder_getAsset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states the action and return, but does not mention side effects, permissions, error conditions, or safety. A simple read operation, but without explicit non-destructive hint, transparency is minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One sentence plus a method tag; no fluff. Efficient, but could include brief usage context without harming conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It doesn't explain what 'returns the model' means in practice, or handle edge cases. For a simple getter, more context would be beneficial.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so parameters are already described. The description adds examples for 'target' (e.g., 'event:/SFX/Hit') which aids understanding, but for 'path' it simply repeats the schema. Baseline 3 due to high coverage, plus minor added value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states it retrieves an asset at a given path and returns the model. The verb 'retrieves' and resource 'asset' are specific. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like fmod_Asset_getAbsoluteAssetPath or fmod_Folder_getItem, but the name implies it's for MasterAssetFolder.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like fmod_Folder_getItem or other asset retrievers. The description lacks context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.