fmod_Event_get3DAttributes

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Retrieves the 3D attributes' without explaining what those attributes are (e.g., position, orientation) or confirming it is a safe, read-only operation. The method reference adds little behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, consisting of one sentence and a reference. It is front-loaded with the essential action. However, it could be slightly more informative without losing conciseness, e.g., by hinting at the returned structure.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that there is no output schema, the description should provide some indication of what the 3D attributes consist of (e.g., position, orientation, velocity) or the shape of the return value. It does not, leaving the agent uncertain about what to expect.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter 'target' described in detail in the schema. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 applies. No extra semantic info is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool retrieves the 3D attributes of an event, which is a specific verb+resource combination. It implicitly distinguishes from the sibling 'fmod_Event_set3DAttributes' but does not explicitly differentiate from other getter tools for events.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other getter tools or the setter counterpart. There is no mention of context, prerequisites, or conditions for appropriate use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.