fmod_AutomationCurve_addAutomationPoint

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses that creation returns a ManagedObject but does not mention side effects, validation, or whether existing points are affected. Minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the primary action. The bracketed reference adds minor clutter but does not significantly detract. It earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description explains the return type (ManagedObject) but lacks details on return structure or error conditions. For a simple creation tool with 3 well-described parameters, it is moderately complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions already provided. The description adds constraints for value and position (range requirements), which adds some value beyond the schema. No new parameter-level details beyond that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates an automation point on a curve and returns a ManagedObject. It uses a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate among siblings like fmod_Automator_addAutomationCurve which adds a curve, but the distinction is implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., adding a curve or modifying points). The description does not specify prerequisites such as requiring an existing AutomationCurve object.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.