fmod_project_audioFileImported_disconnect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses the consequence of not disconnecting and emphasizes the need to disconnect. It does not detail side effects or reversibility, but what is said is clear and honest.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two sentences and a tag. Every sentence adds value. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this is a simple disconnect with one parameter and no output schema, the description captures the essential behavior and motivation. It could mention what happens after disconnection, but for a straightforward cleanup tool it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'connectFunction' has an empty schema description, and the tool description merely names it without explaining its nature or format. For a functional reference, more explanation is needed to avoid ambiguity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool disconnects the connectFunction and distinguishes it from its sibling connect tool. It uses precise language ('Disconnects the connectFunction') and references the method tag.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use ('once it is no longer needed') and why it is important (prevents accumulation and unexpected behavior). While alternatives are not explicitly stated, the context of connect and disconnect is implied by sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.