fmod_Event_togglePause

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks details beyond the toggling action. It does not disclose error handling (e.g., what happens if the event is not playing), side effects, or return value. With no annotations, the agent has insufficient behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise, consisting of one sentence and a method reference. While it is not verbose, it is also not front-loaded with the most critical information. It could benefit from a bit more structured detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to mention return values, error cases, or state dependencies (e.g., event must be loaded). The agent may need to rely on trial and error or extra context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides a complete description of the 'target' parameter (100% coverage). The tool description offers no additional semantic value beyond the schema, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Toggles the pause state') and the resource ('event instance'), making the purpose unambiguous. The verb 'toggle' is specific and distinguishes it from other event state tools like play or stop.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as fmod_Event_play or fmod_Event_stopImmediate. There is no mention of prerequisites (e.g., event must be playing) or scenarios where toggling is inappropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.