fmod_window_navigateTo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions opening a new window if required and returns true on success, but does not specify behavior on failure (e.g., returns false or throws), side effects, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but contains a duplicate sentence and an unnecessary annotation '[method · window.navigateTo]'. It could be streamlined to avoid redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is too minimal. It fails to explain what constitutes success, how to provide a valid ManagedObject, or when a new window is opened. In the context of many sibling tools, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'managedObject' has an empty description in the schema. The tool description implies it is the object to navigate to, but provides no format or type details (e.g., ID, path, reference). With 0% schema coverage, the description insufficiently compensates.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it navigates to a ManagedObject in the UI, with a distinctive verb and resource. However, the duplicate sentence 'Returns true if successful.' detracts slightly from clarity. It is distinguishable from sibling tools like fmod_window_open and fmod_window_triggerAction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use, or how it differs from sibling tools like fmod_window_open.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.