fmod_project_buildStarted_disconnect

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries the burden. It mentions the consequence of not disconnecting but does not detail side effects, prerequisites, or behavior when already disconnected. Lacks sufficient transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at two sentences plus a bracketed note. The note may be extraneous but does not harm clarity. Could be slightly tighter, but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple disconnect tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description fails to specify the parameter's nature. Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate but does not. Incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter 'connectFunction' has no description in the schema (0% coverage) and the tool description merely references it without explaining its type, source, or expected format. No added meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool disconnects a connectFunction for cleanup, with a clear verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling connect tools and explains the importance, leaving no ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says to disconnect when 'no longer needed' and warns about accumulation, but does not provide explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tools. Usage context is implied but not comprehensive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.