fmod_ui_pathType

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states that it is an enumeration and controls dialog behavior, but does not disclose side effects, return values, or what happens on invalid input. Minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but somewhat vague. The sentence structure is acceptable, but it could be more direct. No wasted words, but also lacks clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple enumeration getter/setter, the description provides basic understanding. However, it does not explain return format or mention possible enum values, which reduces completeness. It is adequate but not rich.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter, and the description adds the nuance that omitting the value reads the current value. However, it does not list the actual enum values, relying on a reference to a property. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool represents an enumeration for path types used by a PathLineEdit UI component, and it controls the behavior of a browser dialog. This is specific and distinguishes it from other ui_* tools, though it could be more explicit about the get/set capability.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention any prerequisites, exclusions, or compare with sibling tools like fmod_ui_alignment or fmod_ui_echoMode.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.