fmod_set_property

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Explains how values are auto-embedded (numbers/booleans as literals, paths/GUIDs as references, else string). However, no annotations exist, and the description does not disclose side effects such as immediate application, persistence, or error handling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with excellent front-loading. Every part is informative, no redundancy. Includes example and value embedding details without extra fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (3 parameters, no output schema), the description covers main functionality and value embedding. It could mention return value or error cases but remains sufficient for basic use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema covers only target parameter. Description adds meaning for value (auto-embedding rules) but says nothing about property, which remains undocumented. Overall, partial compensation for low schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Set any property of an object') with concrete examples ('instrument 'audioFile' = an asset, or 'name'). It distinguishes from sibling 'fmod_get_property' by focusing on setting rather than getting.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides general guidance on when to set properties but lacks explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives. No mention of prerequisites or context for choosing this over get_property.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.