create_extension_dashboard

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already indicate this is a mutation (readOnlyHint=false), but the description does not add any behavioral details like what the tool returns, side effects, or prerequisites. For a create operation, this lack of disclosure leaves the agent without critical information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise with only two short sentences. It avoids fluff, but the brevity comes at the cost of missing important details about usage and behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of an output schema, the description should at least hint at what is returned (e.g., dashboard ID). It also fails to differentiate from similar sibling tools, making it incomplete for an agent to fully understand the tool's role.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, the input schema already describes all parameters adequately. The description adds no additional context or meaning beyond what the schema provides, so a baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'create' and the resource 'extension dashboard page'. It also explains the relationship with extensions: 'Extensions are installed onto dashboard pages.' However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'create_extension' or 'install_extension', which may cause confusion.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_extension or install_extension. An AI agent would need to infer context from the tool name alone, which increases the risk of incorrect selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.