airtable-user-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to airtable-user-mcp
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides read and write access to Airtable databases. This server enables LLMs to inspect database schemas, then read and write records.1,682 npm458TypeScriptMIT
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Airtable API — manage records, bases, tables, fields, and webhooks through 18 tools.5 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExtends Airtable MCP server with full CRUD, bulk import/upsert, data analysis, schema validation, and data export capabilities.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that provides tools for programmatically managing Airtable bases, tables, fields, and records through Claude Desktop or other MCP clients.12217 npm75MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceLightweight TypeScript MCP server for Airtable base discovery, table/view queries, record CRUD, and validated filterByFormula construction.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceA production-ready MCP server for Airtable that enables programmatic management of bases, tables, fields, and records through Claude Desktop or other MCP clients using Effect for type-safe and robust API interactions.3 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for the Notion API. Provides 22 tools for full CRUD operations on pages, databases, blocks, users, and comments.1 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 67 tools
Each tool has a clearly defined purpose with detailed descriptions, enabling an agent to distinguish even closely related operations (e.g., move_overall_columns vs move_visible_columns). There is no overlap that would cause confusion.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_field, list_tables, update_view_filters). No mixed conventions or ambiguous verb choices.
With 67 tools, the server is far beyond the typical 3-15 well-scoped range. While it covers many aspects of Airtable, the number is excessive and would overwhelm an agent, leading to slower selection.
Surprisingly missing fundamental record CRUD operations (create_record, update_record, delete_record) despite having many advanced features like view configuration and extension management. This gap severely limits the server's usefulness for core Airtable tasks.