Batch Update Form

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare destructiveHint=true, and description elaborates by listing destructive actions (deleteItem). It also mentions non-destructive updates (metadata, settings). Adds context beyond annotations, such as supporting add/update/delete operations. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences. First sentence states core purpose. Second lists operations (some redundancy with description). Third notes primary usage. No unnecessary words, but could be slightly more structured (e.g., bullet points).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 required parameters, full schema coverage, and presence of output schema, the description covers the main use case. Does not mention prerequisites like permissions, but annotations (destructiveHint) imply mutation. Sufficient for typical usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (all parameters described in schema). The description does not add extra parameter details beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline of 3 is appropriate since schema alone is sufficient.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states: 'Apply batch updates to a Google Form.' Lists supported operations (adding, updating, deleting items; updating metadata/settings). Distinguishes from sibling tools like create_form and get_form by noting it's the 'primary method for modifying form content after creation.' Purpose is specific and well-defined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies usage for modifications after creation ('primary method for modifying form content after creation'). Does not explicitly exclude creation or list alternatives, but the context of sibling tools (create_form) provides clear differentiation. Lacks explicit 'when not to use' guidance, but sufficient for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.