clickup_space_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It states the space uses workspace defaults and returns the created object with its new ID, but does not disclose permissions required, potential duplicate name handling, or any side effects. For a creation tool, the transparency is decent but could mention more about underlying behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: purpose, behavior note (defaults and customization), return value. No redundant words. Each sentence adds necessary information. Efficient and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 3 parameters, 100% schema coverage, and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. It specifies the return includes the object with its ID, which is critical. It could mention the team context (already in param) or potential error cases, but for a simple creation tool, this is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter described. The description does not add meaning beyond what the schema provides (e.g., 'name' as display name, 'private' as boolean). The description's mention of default feature sets is behavioral, not parameter-specific. Since schema already explains parameters well, a 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new top-level space in a ClickUp workspace' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like clickup_folder_create and clickup_list_create by specifying 'top-level space'. The detail about using workspace defaults further clarifies the tool's specific function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains that the new space uses default feature sets and can be customized later, providing context on when to use this tool (for quick creation with defaults). It doesn't explicitly state when not to use it or compare to alternatives, but the guidance about customization implies it's not for fully configured spaces. Adequate but not exhaustive.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.