Add event commands

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It explains the insertion position (before terminator or at index) and handles multi-line constructs. However, it omits details on error handling, side effects, idempotency, or whether the operation is reversible.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (3 sentences) and front-loaded with the core purpose. It could be slightly more structured, but every sentence adds value without unnecessary verbosity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 5 parameters and insertion logic, but the description lacks information about return values, error cases, or constraints. Without an output schema, the description should at least hint at what the operation returns or what happens on failure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 60%, missing descriptions for mapId and eventId. The description adds meaning for 'commands' (multi-line constructs) and 'index' (position), but does not compensate for the missing parameter descriptions or clarify the role of required parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it inserts commands into an event page's command list, specifying the action 'insert' and the resource. It mentions avoiding resending the whole event, which hints at its targeted nature, but does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like update_event.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides some context by noting 'without resending the whole event', implying use when only adding commands. However, it lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., update_event), and does not mention prerequisites or conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.