modifiers.add
Add a modifier to an object's stack, specifying type and optional name or target object.
Instructions
Add a modifier to an object's stack
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | ||
| type | Yes | ||
| object | No |
Add a modifier to an object's stack, specifying type and optional name or target object.
Add a modifier to an object's stack
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | No | ||
| type | Yes | ||
| object | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must cover behavioral traits. It only states 'add a modifier' but does not disclose destructive intent, mode requirements, or side effects on the object or scene.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, concise but overly brief. It lacks structure and could benefit from a second sentence explaining parameters or usage context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has three parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, side effects, or the result of the operation, leaving the agent underinformed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description adds no parameter information. The schema titles already provide the minimal meaning; the description offers no additional value.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Add') and resource ('modifier') with context ('object's stack'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like modifiers.remove or modifiers.list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., modifiers.set, modifiers.apply). No prerequisites or context for invocation are mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OhaoTech/niua-blender-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server