app.addons
List Blender add-ons and display their enabled and loaded status to verify add-on configuration.
Instructions
List available Blender add-ons with enabled and loaded state
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List Blender add-ons and display their enabled and loaded status to verify add-on configuration.
List available Blender add-ons with enabled and loaded state
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Despite no annotations, the description discloses the tool's output (list of add-ons with state) and implies it is read-only by using 'list'. No side effects or additional behaviors are mentioned, but for a simple list tool, this is sufficient.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with the action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description fully captures its purpose and output. It is complete for its low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
There are zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. No parameter information is needed, and the description does not add any, which is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'Blender add-ons', and specifies the output includes enabled/loaded state. It distinguishes from siblings like app.addon_enable which perform actions rather than listing.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage is implied as a listing tool for add-ons, but no explicit guidance on when to use it versus alternatives (e.g., app.preferences_summary) or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OhaoTech/niua-blender-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server