app.workspace_set

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral transparency. It states 'switch' but does not disclose side effects (e.g., whether it changes the workspace for all windows, whether it fails silently, or if it requires an open window). Beyond the basic action, there is no additional behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient, directly communicating the action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (1 parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description provides the basic purpose but leaves out potential prerequisites (e.g., workspace must exist) and error cases. It is adequate for a simple action but not fully comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has one parameter 'name' with only a title. Schema coverage is 0%. The description adds only 'named workspace', which slightly reinforces that the parameter refers to a workspace name. No details on valid values, format, or case sensitivity are provided, so the description adds little beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description is specific: 'Switch the active window to a named workspace'. It clearly states the verb (switch), resource (active window), and target (workspace by name). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like app.workspaces which lists workspaces, or other window management tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description has no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies usage by stating the action, but does not mention prerequisites, conditions, or cases where another tool might be preferable. No comparisons to sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.