app.workspaces
List workspaces and report the active workspace to manage project organization and asset workflows in Blender.
Instructions
List workspaces and report the active workspace
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List workspaces and report the active workspace to manage project organization and asset workflows in Blender.
List workspaces and report the active workspace
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, description bears full transparency burden. It indicates read-only behavior (list and report) but does not disclose edge cases, return format, or any permissions needed. Adequate for a simple stateless tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: 6 words, single phrase. No superfluous content; every word earns its place.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no output schema, so description should hint at return value. It implies a list and active workspace indication, but lacks details like structure or example. Sufficient for a simple query but not comprehensive.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds no parameter info, but baseline 3 is appropriate as no compensation needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verbs 'list' and 'report' on resource 'workspaces', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like app.workspace_set which modifies workspaces.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., app.workspace_set for changing workspace, or app.info for general info). Agent is left to infer usage from context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/OhaoTech/niua-blender-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server