update_policy
Update an existing policy in OpenMetadata by providing the policy ID and the new policy data.
Instructions
Update an existing policy
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| policy_id | Yes | ||
| policy_data | Yes |
Update an existing policy in OpenMetadata by providing the policy ID and the new policy data.
Update an existing policy
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| policy_id | Yes | ||
| policy_data | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, yet description only says 'Update an existing policy' without disclosing any behavioral details like idempotency, permission requirements, or what happens if policy does not exist.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks any structure or additional details; it is under-specified.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given two parameters (one nested object) and no output schema, the description is severely incomplete. It does not explain return value, error cases, or the expected format of policy_data.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and description adds no meaning to the two parameters (policy_id, policy_data). The policy_data object is unexplained, leaving agents blind to required structure.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'Update an existing policy' which clearly indicates verb (update) and resource (policy). It distinguishes from create, delete, get, list, and validate siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, nor any prerequisites or when-not-to-use conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server