update_database_service
Update a database service's metadata by supplying its service ID and the new data to apply.
Instructions
Update a database service
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| service_id | Yes | ||
| service_data | Yes |
Update a database service's metadata by supplying its service ID and the new data to apply.
Update a database service
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| service_id | Yes | ||
| service_data | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description fails to disclose any behavioral traits such as required permissions, side effects, or error conditions. The term 'update' implies mutation but offers no details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
While short, the description is under-specified and does not front-load critical information. It sacrifices clarity for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given two parameters (one being an object with undefined structure) and no output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient for an agent to use the tool correctly without additional knowledge.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain what 'service_data' should contain or any constraints. It adds no meaning beyond the parameter names.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the verb 'Update' and resource 'database service', which is clear. However, it does not differentiate from many other update tools (e.g., update_dashboard) and lacks specifics on what aspects can be updated.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool over siblings like create_database_service or delete_database_service. The description offers no context on prerequisite conditions or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server