get_role
Retrieve details of a specific role in OpenMetadata by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Get details of a specific role by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No | ||
| include_deleted | No |
Retrieve details of a specific role in OpenMetadata by providing its unique ID.
Get details of a specific role by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| role_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No | ||
| include_deleted | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided and description lacks behavioral details such as permissions, error cases, or side effects; minimal transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single concise sentence, no wasted words, but could benefit from additional context.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema and no annotations; description is too brief to fully inform an agent about return format or parameter usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 3 parameters but description does not explain their meaning beyond the schema; schema coverage is 0%, and description adds no value for fields or include_deleted.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and resource 'details of a specific role by ID', distinguishing it from siblings like 'get_role_by_name' and 'list_roles'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit when-to-use or alternatives provided; usage is implied for retrieving a role by ID, but no guidance on when to use alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server