get_test_suite_by_name

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, and description only states 'Get details'. It does not disclose read-only nature, potential side effects, permission requirements, or behavior regarding deleted entities (despite 'include_deleted' parameter).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at 8 words. Front-loaded with the core purpose. However, the brevity sacrifices necessary detail, making it borderline too terse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 3 parameters and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain return format, parameter usage, or behavioral nuances, leaving significant gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and description adds no meaning beyond parameter names. The purpose of 'fields' and 'include_deleted' is not explained, leaving ambiguity for the agent.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (get) and resource (details of a specific test suite by name). It is specific enough to distinguish from other get tools, though it could be more explicit about the scope of 'details'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives like 'get_test_suite' or 'get_test_suite_execution_summary'. The description does not mention context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.