get_user_by_name
Retrieve a user's details from OpenMetadata by providing their user name.
Instructions
Get details of a specific user by name
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve a user's details from OpenMetadata by providing their user name.
Get details of a specific user by name
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description only says 'get details' implying read-only but lacks specifics on what details are returned, pagination, errors, or permissions needed. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no extraneous words. Efficient and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema, so description should explain return values and behavior. Does not cover what details are returned or how fields parameter affects response. Incomplete for a simple retrieval tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage. The description does not explain the 'fields' parameter (optional, string/null). Fails to add meaning beyond schema structure.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states verb 'get', resource 'user details', and identifier 'by name'. Distinguishes from siblings like get_user (likely by ID) and other get_* tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as list_users, search_entities, or get_user. No mention of when not to use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server