get_ml_model
Retrieve details of a machine learning model by providing its unique ID to access its metadata.
Instructions
Get details of a specific ML model by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve details of a machine learning model by providing its unique ID to access its metadata.
Get details of a specific ML model by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| model_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It only says 'Get details' without disclosing read-only nature, side effects, or what constitutes 'details'. Minimal behavioral insight.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, but it lacks structure (e.g., no bullet points or logical segmentation). Adequate but not optimized.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With no output schema and only minimal description, the tool is under-described. Missing information about return format, pagination, or error conditions.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the purpose of model_id or the optional fields parameter. It adds no meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get details'), the resource ('specific ML model'), and the method ('by ID'). It distinguishes from sibling get_ml_model_by_name, which uses a different identifier.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_ml_model_by_name. No context on prerequisites or typical scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server