get_bot
Retrieve details of a specific bot by providing its unique ID. Access bot configuration and metadata through OpenMetadata.
Instructions
Get details of a specific bot by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bot_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve details of a specific bot by providing its unique ID. Access bot configuration and metadata through OpenMetadata.
Get details of a specific bot by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bot_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, and the description only says 'Get details' without mentioning permissions, rate limits, or any side effects. The behavioral transparency is minimal.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, straightforward sentence with no waste. However, it is too brief to fully inform the agent.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool, the description is adequate but lacks explanation of return values or the scope of 'details'. Without an output schema, more context would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage, but the description adds no extra meaning to the parameters. For example, it doesn't explain what 'fields' represents or how to use it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'bot', and the identifier 'by ID'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like get_bot_by_name and list_bots.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as get_bot_by_name or list_bots. No usage context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server