delete_event_subscription
Remove an event subscription by ID, with optional hard delete to permanently erase it.
Instructions
Delete an event subscription
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | Yes | ||
| hard_delete | No |
Remove an event subscription by ID, with optional hard delete to permanently erase it.
Delete an event subscription
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| subscription_id | Yes | ||
| hard_delete | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It does not explain the effects of the 'hard_delete' parameter, whether the operation is reversible, or any permissions required. This leaves significant uncertainty about the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, making it concise, but it is too brief to be useful. It sacrifices essential information for brevity, resulting in a mediocre balance.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations and output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to mention return values, error handling, or the distinction between soft and hard delete, leaving critical gaps for an agent to safely use this tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description carries full responsibility for explaining parameters. It mentions neither 'subscription_id' nor 'hard_delete', leaving users to guess their purpose, especially 'hard_delete' which is non-obvious.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'event subscription', which is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like create_event_subscription or get_event_subscription.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, such as prerequisites or differences from soft deletion. The presence of a 'hard_delete' parameter suggests alternative behaviors, but the description does not clarify when each should be used.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server