get_table
Retrieve metadata details of a specific table by providing its unique identifier.
Instructions
Get details of a specific table by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| table_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Retrieve metadata details of a specific table by providing its unique identifier.
Get details of a specific table by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| table_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the burden is on the description to disclose behavioral traits. The description only says 'Get details' without specifying what details are returned, whether it's a simple read operation, or any other side effects. More context needed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One short sentence that is front-loaded and to the point. No wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and annotations, the description should provide more context about return values, what 'details' include, and how the fields parameter works. Currently too minimal.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
While the input schema has two parameters, the description only mentions table_id. The optional 'fields' parameter is completely ignored. The schema has 0% description coverage, so the description should explain all parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves details of a specific table using an ID. It explicitly distinguishes from the sibling tool get_table_by_name which uses name instead of ID.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_table_by_name. It only mentions 'by ID' but doesn't explain when one should prefer ID lookup over name lookup.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server