create_bot
Create a new bot in OpenMetadata by providing bot configuration data.
Instructions
Create a new bot in OpenMetadata
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bot_data | Yes |
Create a new bot in OpenMetadata by providing bot configuration data.
Create a new bot in OpenMetadata
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| bot_data | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden. It only states 'Create a new bot' without disclosing any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, destructive potential, side effects, or idempotency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (one sentence) and front-loaded, but it lacks necessary detail such that it is under-specifying for the complexity of the tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and a nested object parameter, the description is far from complete. It does not cover return values, error cases, or required fields, making it inadequate for reliable agent invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has one parameter 'bot_data' with 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain what this parameter should contain or its structure, leaving the agent with no semantic guidance.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('a new bot in OpenMetadata'), making the purpose immediately obvious and distinguishable from sibling tools like get_bot, update_bot, or delete_bot.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites, no context on when not to use it, and no mention of error conditions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server