get_domain
Retrieve complete details of a specific domain by its ID from OpenMetadata.
Instructions
Get details of a specific domain by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No | ||
| include_deleted | No |
Retrieve complete details of a specific domain by its ID from OpenMetadata.
Get details of a specific domain by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain_id | Yes | ||
| fields | No | ||
| include_deleted | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description only says 'Get details' implying read-only but doesn't disclose permissions, side effects, or what 'details' includes. Missing behavioral context for a non-annotated tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no filler. Front-loaded with purpose. Could add a bit more info without losing conciseness, but currently efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 3 parameters and no output schema or annotations, the description is too minimal. Missing details on optional parameters, output, and behavioral traits.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage; description only implies domain_id by saying 'by ID' but does not explain fields or include_deleted parameters. Fails to add meaning beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'domain', and the method 'by ID'. It distinguishes from siblings like get_domain_by_name that retrieve by name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. Sibling get_domain_by_name exists but is not mentioned. No when-not-to or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server