create_metric
Create a new metric in OpenMetadata to define and track data quality or business KPIs.
Instructions
Create a new metric in OpenMetadata
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric_data | Yes |
Create a new metric in OpenMetadata to define and track data quality or business KPIs.
Create a new metric in OpenMetadata
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| metric_data | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description must disclose behavior. It only states 'create', but fails to mention mutation effects, idempotency, permissions, or error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
It is a single sentence, concise but overly minimal. Lacks structure and key details that could be added without being verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and a complex object parameter, the description provides no information about return values, parameter structure, or side effects, making it highly incomplete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'metric_data' is an object with no description in schema (coverage 0%) and the description adds nothing about its structure or expected content.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description states the action ('create') and resource ('metric') in OpenMetadata, which is clear. However, it does not distinguish this tool from many sibling 'create_*' tools, so it lacks specificity to differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_table or create_chart. There is no context about prerequisites or scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server