create_container
Creates a new container in OpenMetadata to organize and manage data assets.
Instructions
Create a new container in OpenMetadata
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| container_data | Yes |
Creates a new container in OpenMetadata to organize and manage data assets.
Create a new container in OpenMetadata
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| container_data | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states 'Create' which implies mutation, but provides no details about permissions, side effects, idempotency, or return value. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's behavior.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, but it is underspecified rather than concise. It lacks essential information and does not earn its place; it could be much more informative without adding significant length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the complexity (nested object parameter, no annotations, no output schema) and the many sibling tools, the description is critically incomplete. An agent cannot reliably use this tool based solely on this description and schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage for the single required parameter 'container_data'. The description does not explain what fields or structure this object expects, leaving the agent completely in the dark about how to populate it.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Create') and resource ('container') and the context ('in OpenMetadata'). However, it does not differentiate from sibling create_* tools like create_table or create_schema, so the purpose is clear but not distinguished.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., using update_container for existing containers, or other create tools). No prerequisites or context are provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/yangkyeongmo/mcp-server-openmetadata'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server